Warning: include(/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/includes/code.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 2

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/includes/code.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 2
The Performance of Abutment Material and Finish Line Configuration on the Stress Distribution and Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Zirconia Fixed Partial Dentures When Loaded in a Bio-Faithful Model
Warning: include(/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prdincludes/05_update/javascript.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 39

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prdincludes/05_update/javascript.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 39
Follow Us      

LOGIN

   Official Journal of The Academy of Osseointegration

 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 41 , Issue 6
November/December 2021

Pages e265–e275


The Performance of Abutment Material and Finish Line Configuration on the Stress Distribution and Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Zirconia Fixed Partial Dentures When Loaded in a Bio-Faithful Model


Mohamed M. Radwan, DDS, MDS, PhD/A. A. Shabban, DDS, MDS, PhD/Donia Elshafey, DDS, MDS/Aliaa I. Mahrous, DDS, MDS, PhD


PMID: 34818395
DOI: 10.11607/prd.5569

This computational study analyzed the strain magnitude and distribution within trabecular bone structure around different materials and finish line (FL) configurations of implant abutments loaded axially. Differences in fracture resistance of these abutments were also assessed. Sixteen endosseous screw vent implants were embedded in eight bio-faithful mandibular simulators resembling D2 and D3 bone density (n = 4 models per bone type) in the second premolar and second molar positions. These models were further subdivided into eight subgroups with different FL configurations and abutment materials. Strain gauges were mounted adjacent to the implants, and the superstructures were successively placed on the abutments. A universal dynamometrical testing apparatus was used for a static compression load. Finally, all samples were subjected to load until fracture. Three-way analysis of variance for strain analysis showed a significant overall interaction between the three variables (bone type, FL configuration, and abutment materials; P < .001), while the analysis for fracture resistance showed significant two-way interactions between bone type and FL configuration (P < .001) and between bone type and abutment material (P < .001). The implant abutment material, the FL configuration of the abutment, and the bone type can influence the mechanical behavior of the abutment used. Zirconia abutments with anatomical FL configurations possess better fracture resistance than zirconia and titanium abutments with circular FL configurations in D2 bone density.


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2020 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

PRD Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help